Talking to a colleague today, we both came upon an interesting legal question: is a social media hashtag a trademark that one can register?
For those who are not familiar with hashtags, it is a word or phrase preceded by a “#” that accompanies text. Hashtags are used to categorize the content of a social media posting on Facebook, Twitter and other platforms, group content together and make social media postings searchable. Businesses use hashtags to promote product and engage audiences throughout social media. Social media platforms have even developed a stream of revenue by allowing businesses and individual to “promote” hashtags and receive preferential listing on their websites.
The emergence of social media hashtags has had a huge impact in social media marketing. It is a great way to communicate social media messages, build brand loyalty and associate identifying characteristics with a brand and its audience. According to the International Trademark Association, over 600 federal trademark applications have been submitted to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for hashtag marks.
However, the law remains murky on what exactly a hashtag is. The USPTO’s rules recognizes that a term containing a “#” may be a trademark “if it functions as an identifier of the source of the applicant’s goods or services.” However, those same USPTO rules will not allow registration of hashtags consisting solely of descriptive or generic wording for goods or services.
To further complicate matters, a federal district court in California recently found that hashtags are not trademarks. In the matter of Eksouzian v. Albanese, the California district court held that hashtags are “merely descriptive devices, not trademarks, unitary or otherwise” and “merely a functional tool [and] not an actual trademark.”
The decision seems to directly conflict with the USPTO rules and pose an interesting, and possibly costly, conundrum for businesses. This decision seemingly invalidates the USPTO rules on hashtags without even addressing the rules themselves. Those owners that have successfully registered hashtags may be once again in danger of losing the investment in goodwill that the registration provided. It remains to be seen what other courts will do when faced with the same or similar issue.
For now, the International Trademark association recommends that businesses take steps to protect their brands on social media, including consider registering “only the underlying word or phrase without the hash symbol or the term ‘hashtag'” to clarify its functions as a source identifier. Another tip to follow is to not include any trade name or primary brand in a hashtag so you avoid the “trap” used in the Ekouzian case.
We here at IPG will be monitoring developments in this area of the law with great interest.
*Gene Berardelli may be contacted at: GeneBerardelli@ipglegal.com.
Gene is a New York street-smart attorney with an extreme passion for success. Gene specializes in litigation, arbitration and general corporate law for New York-based and international clients. He, also, is the host of a popular New York talk radio program.
- Federal Trademark Basics: What You Can Learn From The “New York Fashion Week” Trademark Controversy
- New York Legislature Debate: Can Uber And Lyft Expand Throughout New York State?
- Employment Law News: NLRB Judge Says Chipotle Is Liable For Labor Violation For Enforcing “Unlawful” Social Media Policy
- Infringement vs. Fair Use? Protecting Federal Trademarks
- New York Legal News: No More Private Settlements of Federal Fair Labor Claims
- When Must Your NY Business Agreements Be In Writing?